FACTS: For his bootlegging
business, Pete Castellano is renting Lipari warehouse from Turk Sollozzo.
One day, Sollozzo sold the said property to Castellano and the latter paid the
selling price upon the execution of
their handwritten agreement.
A few years later, Tony
Soprano appeared at the warehouse demanding that Castellano leave the premises
as he allegedly bought the property from Turk Sollozzo. Soprano showed
Castellano a notarized deed of absolute sale and served upon the latter a
notice to vacate, with a warning that any failure of Castellano to comply would
result in a court action or a "friendly visit" by enforcers from the
Soprano family.
As Castellano's consigliere, he seeks your
wisdom on the matter.
ISSUE: Who has the better right to the
warehouse?
HELD: In double sale
of an immovable, the following is the established rule of preference in
determining ownership:
(a)
the person acquiring it who
in good faith first recorded it in the Registry of Property;
(b)
the person who in good faith was first in
the possession; and
(c)
in the absence thereof, to the person who
presents the oldest title, provided there is good faith .
It must be observed that
the law strictly requires that before the second buyer can obtain priority
over the first, he must show that he acted
in good faith throughout (i.e., in ignorance of the first sale and of the
first buyer’s rights) from the time of acquisition until the title is
transferred to him by registration or failing registration, by delivery of
possession.
It must be noted that
Soprano cannot be deemed to be in good faith because when he bought the real
property, it is in possession of Castellano, a person other than the seller,
Sollozzo. In the case of Conspecto vs. Fuerto, the Supreme Court
pronounced that, one who purchases real property which is in actual
possession of others should, at least, make some inquiry concerning the
rights of those in possession. The actual possession by people other than the
vendor should, at least, put the purchaser upon inquiry. He can scarcely, in
the absence of such inquiry, be regarded as a bona fide purchaser as against
such possessions.
Nice post... very informative
ReplyDeleteSir Don,
ReplyDeletewhat if the first buyer bought the land without any deed of sale but only thru word of mouth. the possession of the property is with the first buyer.. who is the purchaser in good faith? and who has more right over the property?
Isnt the Traditio Stuffs take place in that Situation? Dunno Really
DeleteIf only by word of mouth, no written agreement whatsoever, that sale is deemed pretty much unenforceable in the courts.
Deletesir, can you give the title of the case and the promulgation date?
ReplyDeleteI got what you mean , thanks for posting .Woh I am lucky to find this website through google. Probate and estate planning Lawyer Malvern
ReplyDeleteDivorce Solicitor… [...]we like to honor other sites on the web, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[...]… family law matter
ReplyDelete